Core i3-4160 vs i7-9850H
Description
The i3-4160 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the i7-9850H gets 145.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2.8 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the i7-9850H gets 145.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2.8 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
906ed
Core
Haswell
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
54 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2014
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
34.16k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
74k points
289.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4160
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.13k
4.11k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
10.33k
15.19k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.64k
5.04k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
11.98k (x3.03)
TOTAL
23.06k
36.32k (x1.58)
Multithread
i3-4160
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
22.68k (x3.04)
Test#2 (FP)
26.62k
83.77k (x3.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.46k
30.37k (x2.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
8.55k (x1.36)
TOTAL
51.81k
145.37k (x2.81)
Performance/W
i3-4160
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
138 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
493 points/W
1862 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
675 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
190 points/W
TOTAL
959 points/W
3231 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4160
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
1148 points/GHz
893 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2869 points/GHz
3302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1290 points/GHz
1096 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1098 points/GHz
2605 points/GHz
TOTAL
6405 points/GHz
7895 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4