Core i3-4160 vs i7-4820K
Description
The i3-4160 is based on Haswell architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 74 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1.8 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 74 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4820K is 1.8 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
306e4
Core
Haswell
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
54 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2014
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
34.16k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
74k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4160
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
11.85k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
12k
11.84k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
4.69k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
4.12k (x0.97)
TOTAL
34.16k
32.49k (x0.95)
Multithread
i3-4160
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
27.45k
47.65k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
28.96k
54.81k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.83k
21.56k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
10.05k (x1.74)
TOTAL
74k
134.08k (x1.81)
Performance/W
i3-4160
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
508 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
536 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
219 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
1370 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4160
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3616 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3334 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1363 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1175 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
9488 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4