Core i3-4160 vs i5-10300H
Description
The i3-4160 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 74 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 74 k points while the i5-10300H gets 92.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0652
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
54 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
34.16k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
74k points
246.07k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4160
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
15.65k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
12k
23.13k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
5.66k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
11.43k (x2.7)
TOTAL
34.16k
55.87k (x1.64)
Multithread
i3-4160
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.45k
26.77k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
28.96k
43.81k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.83k
10.17k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
11.91k (x2.07)
TOTAL
74k
92.66k (x1.25)
Performance/W
i3-4160
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
508 points/W
595 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
536 points/W
974 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
219 points/W
226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
1370 points/W
2059 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4160
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3616 points/GHz
3477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3334 points/GHz
5141 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1363 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1175 points/GHz
2540 points/GHz
TOTAL
9488 points/GHz
12415 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4