Core i3-4160 vs Celeron G3900TE
Description
The i3-4160 is based on Haswell architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the G3900TE gets 31.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4160 is 1.6 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the G3900TE gets 31.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4160 is 1.6 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
506e3
Core
Haswell
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
54 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
July 2014
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
34.16k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
74k points
49.34k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4160
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.13k
2.36k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
10.33k
9.79k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.64k
3.08k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
3.36k (x0.85)
TOTAL
23.06k
18.59k (x0.81)
Multithread
i3-4160
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
4.45k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
26.62k
18.16k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.46k
5.48k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
3.5k (x0.56)
TOTAL
51.81k
31.59k (x0.61)
Performance/W
i3-4160
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
138 points/W
127 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
493 points/W
519 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
959 points/W
903 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4160
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
1148 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2869 points/GHz
4259 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1290 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1098 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
TOTAL
6405 points/GHz
8084 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4