Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Description
The i3-4160 is based on Haswell architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the 3750H gets 124 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 2.4 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the 3750H gets 124 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 2.4 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
54 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
34.16k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
74k points
175.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4160
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.13k
3.78k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
10.33k
16.42k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.64k
4.75k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
5.51k (x1.39)
TOTAL
23.06k
30.46k (x1.32)
Multithread
i3-4160
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
15.18k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
26.62k
74.87k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.46k
27.85k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
6.08k (x0.97)
TOTAL
51.81k
123.97k (x2.39)
Performance/W
i3-4160
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
138 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
493 points/W
2139 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
959 points/W
3542 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4160
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1148 points/GHz
945 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2869 points/GHz
4105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1290 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1098 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
TOTAL
6405 points/GHz
7615 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4