Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The i3-4160 is based on Haswell architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 74 k points while the 1700 gets 381.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 5.2 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 74 k points while the 1700 gets 381.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 5.2 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
800f11
Core
Haswell
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
54 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2014
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
34.16k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
74k points
333.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4160
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
13.95k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
12k
22.02k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
5.17k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
16.61k (x3.93)
TOTAL
34.16k
57.75k (x1.69)
Multithread
i3-4160
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
27.45k
120.59k (x4.39)
Test#2 (FP)
28.96k
197.34k (x6.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.83k
56.83k (x4.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
6.41k (x1.11)
TOTAL
74k
381.16k (x5.15)
Performance/W
i3-4160
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
508 points/W
1855 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
536 points/W
3036 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
219 points/W
874 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
1370 points/W
5864 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4160
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3616 points/GHz
3770 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3334 points/GHz
5952 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1363 points/GHz
1397 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1175 points/GHz
4490 points/GHz
TOTAL
9488 points/GHz
15609 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4