Core i3-4160 vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The i3-4160 is based on Haswell architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the 1600X gets 124.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 2.4 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 51.8 k points while the 1600X gets 124.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600X is 2.4 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
800f11
Core
Haswell
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
54 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2014
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
34.16k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
74k points
173.2k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4160
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.13k
3.95k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
10.33k
18.36k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.64k
5.39k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.95k
17.35k (x4.39)
TOTAL
23.06k
45.06k (x1.95)
Multithread
i3-4160
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
19.47k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
26.62k
77.19k (x2.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.46k
15.4k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.27k
12.25k (x1.95)
TOTAL
51.81k
124.3k (x2.4)
Performance/W
i3-4160
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
138 points/W
205 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
493 points/W
813 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
959 points/W
1308 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4160
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
1148 points/GHz
988 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2869 points/GHz
4591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1290 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1098 points/GHz
4338 points/GHz
TOTAL
6405 points/GHz
11265 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4