Core i3-4160 vs FX 4100
Description
The i3-4160 is based on Haswell architecture while the 4100 is based on Bulldozer.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 74 k points while the 4100 gets 44.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4160 is 1.7 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4160 gets a score of 74 k points while the 4100 gets 44.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4160 is 1.7 times faster than the 4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
600f12
Core
Haswell
Zambezi
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
54 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2014
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
34.16k points
22.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
74k points
44.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4160
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.02k
7.65k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
12k
6.9k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.91k
2.88k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.23k
4.75k (x1.12)
TOTAL
34.16k
22.18k (x0.65)
Multithread
i3-4160
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
27.45k
15.53k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
28.96k
15.13k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.83k
7.98k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.77k
5.67k (x0.98)
TOTAL
74k
44.31k (x0.6)
Performance/W
i3-4160
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
508 points/W
163 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
536 points/W
159 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
219 points/W
84 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
60 points/W
TOTAL
1370 points/W
466 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4160
4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3616 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3334 points/GHz
1815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1363 points/GHz
758 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1175 points/GHz
1250 points/GHz
TOTAL
9488 points/GHz
5836 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4