| | | | | | |

Core i3-4030U vs Xeon X5675


Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 36.7 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.

Summarizing, the X5675 is 3.4 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
206c2
Core
Haswell
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
6 /12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2014
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
124.92k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4030U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
6.7k
8.77k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
5.99k
5.82k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.65k
3.47k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
2.98k (x1.4)
TOTAL
17.47k
21.04k (x1.2)

Multithread

i3-4030U

X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
53.23k (x3.72)
Test#2 (FP)
13.83k
39.35k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.12k
27.05k (x4.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
5.28k (x2.13)
TOTAL
36.74k
124.92k (x3.4)

Performance/W
i3-4030U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
953 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
922 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
408 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
2449 points/W
1315 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3525 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3150 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1395 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
9193 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4