Core i3-4030U vs Xeon E5504
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 36.7 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 36.7 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
106a5
Core
Haswell
Gainestown
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2014
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
10.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
41.95k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4030U
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
6.7k
4.57k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
5.99k
3.07k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.65k
1.85k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
1.43k (x0.67)
TOTAL
17.47k
10.92k (x0.63)
Multithread
i3-4030U
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
19.07k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
13.83k
12.52k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.12k
7.97k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
2.39k (x0.96)
TOTAL
36.74k
41.95k (x1.14)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
953 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
922 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
408 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
2449 points/W
524 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
3525 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3150 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1395 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
9193 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4