Core i3-4030U vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 25.2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 25.2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
406f1
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
14/28
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
35840 kB
Date
April 2014
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4030U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
17.8k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
6.16k
16.51k (x2.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
4.47k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
2.56k (x1.15)
TOTAL
21.57k
41.35k (x1.92)
Multithread
i3-4030U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.84k
494.82k (x22.65)
Test#2 (FP)
15.86k
514.13k (x32.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
132.87k (x22.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
20.8k (x8.5)
TOTAL
46.09k
1162.63k (x25.22)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1456 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1057 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
396 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
163 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
3073 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5627 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3241 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
11353 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4