Core i3-4030U vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 5.2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 5.2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
406f1
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2014
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4030U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.14k
2.6k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
7.55k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.61k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.01k
2.03k (x1.01)
TOTAL
11.93k
14.79k (x1.24)
Multithread
i3-4030U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.94k
17.41k (x4.42)
Test#2 (FP)
13.68k
75.46k (x5.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
26.25k (x4.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.44k
4.65k (x1.91)
TOTAL
25.84k
123.78k (x4.79)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4030U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.7k
8.22k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
5.99k
12.06k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.65k
4.01k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
2.89k (x1.35)
TOTAL
17.47k
27.18k (x1.56)
Multithread
i3-4030U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
61.34k (x4.29)
Test#2 (FP)
13.83k
90.21k (x6.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.12k
26.2k (x4.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
4.62k (x1.86)
TOTAL
36.74k
182.37k (x4.96)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4030U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.4k
6.04k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
10.18k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
2.74k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.41k (x1.17)
TOTAL
17.15k
21.37k (x1.25)
Multithread
i3-4030U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
47.51k (x3.7)
Test#2 (FP)
15.12k
75.12k (x4.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
19.72k (x3.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.15k
5.45k (x2.54)
TOTAL
35.88k
147.8k (x4.12)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4030U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
12.16k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
6.16k
11.82k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
3.02k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
2.4k (x1.08)
TOTAL
21.57k
29.39k (x1.36)
Multithread
i3-4030U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.84k
103.77k (x4.75)
Test#2 (FP)
15.86k
102.28k (x6.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
26.13k (x4.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
5.65k (x2.31)
TOTAL
46.09k
237.83k (x5.16)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1456 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1057 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
396 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
163 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
3073 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5627 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3241 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
11353 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4