Core i3-4030U vs Xeon E5-2620
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 35.9 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 6.3 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 35.9 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 6.3 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
206d7
Core
Haswell
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
15360 kB
Date
April 2014
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
224.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4030U
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
6.4k
6.95k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
6.24k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
3.05k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.56k (x1.25)
TOTAL
17.15k
18.8k (x1.1)
Multithread
i3-4030U
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
90.01k (x7)
Test#2 (FP)
15.12k
82.43k (x5.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
42.59k (x7.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.15k
9.66k (x4.5)
TOTAL
35.88k
224.7k (x6.26)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
857 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1008 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
384 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
143 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
2392 points/W
2365 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
3366 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3263 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1317 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1078 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
9024 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4