Core i3-4030U vs Core 2 Duo T5800
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the T5800 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 36.7 k points while the T5800 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 2.8 times faster than the T5800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 36.7 k points while the T5800 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 2.8 times faster than the T5800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
6fd
Core
Haswell
Meron
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
PGA 478
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2014
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
7.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
12.91k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4030U
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
2.14k
1.97k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
1.98k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
1.9k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.01k
1.1k (x0.54)
TOTAL
11.93k
6.95k (x0.58)
Multithread
i3-4030U
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
3.94k
3.71k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
13.68k
3.71k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
3.53k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.44k
1.24k (x0.51)
TOTAL
25.84k
12.2k (x0.47)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4030U
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
6.7k
2.29k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
5.99k
2.05k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.65k
1.96k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
1.07k (x0.5)
TOTAL
17.47k
7.37k (x0.42)
Multithread
i3-4030U
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
4.28k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
13.83k
3.8k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.12k
3.59k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
1.23k (x0.5)
TOTAL
36.74k
12.91k (x0.35)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
953 points/W
122 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
922 points/W
108 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
408 points/W
103 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
2449 points/W
369 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
T5800
Test#1 (Integers)
3525 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3150 points/GHz
1023 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1395 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/GHz
537 points/GHz
TOTAL
9193 points/GHz
3684 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4