Core i3-4030U vs i5-7500
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the i5-7500 gets 191.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 4.2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the i5-7500 gets 191.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 4.2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
906e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2014
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
61.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
191.71k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4030U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.14k
3.87k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
16.09k (x2.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
5.11k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.01k
7.97k (x3.96)
TOTAL
11.93k
33.04k (x2.77)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.94k
14.81k (x3.76)
Test#2 (FP)
13.68k
61.51k (x4.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
19.59k (x3.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.44k
3.68k (x1.51)
TOTAL
25.84k
99.59k (x3.85)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
6.7k
14.09k (x2.1)
Test#2 (FP)
5.99k
19.8k (x3.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.65k
5.34k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
8.45k (x3.96)
TOTAL
17.47k
47.67k (x2.73)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
53.99k (x3.78)
Test#2 (FP)
13.83k
77.43k (x5.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.12k
20.81k (x3.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
2.53k (x1.02)
TOTAL
36.74k
154.77k (x4.21)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
6.4k
14.03k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
21.07k (x3.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
5.15k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
7.77k (x3.79)
TOTAL
17.15k
48.03k (x2.8)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
50.12k (x3.9)
Test#2 (FP)
15.12k
74.8k (x4.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
19.69k (x3.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.15k
5.19k (x2.42)
TOTAL
35.88k
149.79k (x4.18)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
25.59k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
6.16k
22.57k (x3.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
5.27k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
8.08k (x3.63)
TOTAL
21.57k
61.51k (x2.85)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
21.84k
88.3k (x4.04)
Test#2 (FP)
15.86k
78.59k (x4.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
19.72k (x3.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
5.1k (x2.09)
TOTAL
46.09k
191.71k (x4.16)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
1456 points/W
1358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1057 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
396 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
163 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
3073 points/W
2949 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
5627 points/GHz
6734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3241 points/GHz
5939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
11353 points/GHz
16186 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4