Core i3-4030U vs i5-10400T
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 6.7 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 6.7 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4030U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.14k
4k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
14.19k (x2.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
4.62k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.01k
11.03k (x5.47)
TOTAL
11.93k
33.84k (x2.84)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.94k
22.77k (x5.78)
Test#2 (FP)
13.68k
96.59k (x7.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
31.65k (x5.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.44k
2.45k (x1.01)
TOTAL
25.84k
153.46k (x5.94)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.7k
12.61k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
5.99k
17.94k (x3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.65k
4.83k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
10.81k (x5.07)
TOTAL
17.47k
46.19k (x2.64)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
74.62k (x5.22)
Test#2 (FP)
13.83k
119.63k (x8.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.12k
32.65k (x5.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
2.52k (x1.01)
TOTAL
36.74k
229.42k (x6.24)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.4k
12.5k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
19.05k (x3.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
4.72k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
10.3k (x5.03)
TOTAL
17.15k
46.57k (x2.72)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
74.58k (x5.8)
Test#2 (FP)
15.12k
126.96k (x8.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
31.76k (x5.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.15k
2.5k (x1.16)
TOTAL
35.88k
235.8k (x6.57)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
22k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
6.16k
19.98k (x3.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
4.57k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
11.31k (x5.08)
TOTAL
21.57k
57.85k (x2.68)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
21.84k
136.69k (x6.26)
Test#2 (FP)
15.86k
135.25k (x8.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
32.76k (x5.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
2.48k (x1.01)
TOTAL
46.09k
307.18k (x6.66)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1456 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1057 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
396 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
163 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
3073 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5627 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3241 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
11353 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4