Core i3-4030U vs i3-370M
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-370M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 36.7 k points while the i3-370M gets 18.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 2 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 36.7 k points while the i3-370M gets 18.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 2 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
20655
Core
Haswell
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
0.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
8.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
18.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.7k
3.4k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
5.99k
2.35k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.65k
1.35k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
1.39k (x0.65)
TOTAL
17.47k
8.49k (x0.49)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
7.18k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
13.83k
5.13k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.12k
3.5k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
2.33k (x0.94)
TOTAL
36.74k
18.15k (x0.49)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
953 points/W
205 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
922 points/W
147 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
408 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
2449 points/W
518 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
3525 points/GHz
1419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3150 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1395 points/GHz
561 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/GHz
580 points/GHz
TOTAL
9193 points/GHz
3537 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4