Core i3-4030U vs i3-8130U
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.9 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the i3-8130U gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8130U is 1.9 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
806ea
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2014
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
47.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
88.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
21.09k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
6.16k
19.41k (x3.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
4.05k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
2.8k (x1.26)
TOTAL
21.57k
47.35k (x2.19)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.84k
38.23k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
15.86k
38.89k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
8.75k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
2.47k (x1.01)
TOTAL
46.09k
88.35k (x1.92)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
1456 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1057 points/W
2593 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
396 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
163 points/W
165 points/W
TOTAL
3073 points/W
5890 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
i3-8130U
Test#1 (Integers)
5627 points/GHz
6204 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3241 points/GHz
5708 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
823 points/GHz
TOTAL
11353 points/GHz
13925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4