Core i3-4030U vs i3-7100U
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-7100U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the i3-7100U gets 79.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.7 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the i3-7100U gets 79.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100U is 1.7 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
806e9
Core
Haswell
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2014
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
33.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
79.6k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4030U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.14k
2.41k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
9.77k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
3.13k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.01k
3.55k (x1.76)
TOTAL
11.93k
18.86k (x1.58)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.94k
5k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
13.68k
21.48k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
7.39k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.44k
3.18k (x1.3)
TOTAL
25.84k
37.05k (x1.43)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.7k
8.66k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
5.99k
12.31k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.65k
3.28k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
3.92k (x1.84)
TOTAL
17.47k
28.16k (x1.61)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
17.87k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
13.83k
28.59k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.12k
7.68k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
3.15k (x1.27)
TOTAL
36.74k
57.28k (x1.56)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.4k
8.76k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
13.49k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
3.21k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
3.9k (x1.9)
TOTAL
17.15k
29.36k (x1.71)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
18.33k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
15.12k
31.08k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
7.5k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.15k
3.61k (x1.68)
TOTAL
35.88k
60.52k (x1.69)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
13.46k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
6.16k
13.45k (x2.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
3.08k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
3.4k (x1.52)
TOTAL
21.57k
33.38k (x1.55)
Multithread
i3-4030U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.84k
34.95k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
15.86k
33.53k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
7.74k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
3.38k (x1.38)
TOTAL
46.09k
79.6k (x1.73)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
1456 points/W
2330 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1057 points/W
2235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
396 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
163 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
3073 points/W
5307 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
i3-7100U
Test#1 (Integers)
5627 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3241 points/GHz
5606 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1415 points/GHz
TOTAL
11353 points/GHz
13909 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4