| | | | | | |

Core i3-4030U vs i3-10100


Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 3.5 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
a0653
Core
Haswell
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2014
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
162.33k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4030U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
22.74k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
6.16k
20.31k (x3.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
4.71k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
7.65k (x3.43)
TOTAL
21.57k
55.41k (x2.57)

Multithread

i3-4030U

i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
21.84k
71.95k (x3.29)
Test#2 (FP)
15.86k
67.7k (x4.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
16.43k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
6.25k (x2.56)
TOTAL
46.09k
162.33k (x3.52)

Performance/W
i3-4030U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
1456 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1057 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
396 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
163 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
3073 points/W
2497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
5627 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3241 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
11353 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4