Core i3-4030U vs M-5Y10c
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 35.9 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.4 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 35.9 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the M-5Y10c is 1.4 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
306d4
Core
Haswell
Broadwell-Y
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2014
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
51k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4030U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
6.4k
7.22k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
9.98k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
2.75k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.98k (x1.46)
TOTAL
17.15k
22.93k (x1.34)
Multithread
i3-4030U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
15.07k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
15.12k
24.8k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
6.68k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.15k
4.46k (x2.08)
TOTAL
35.88k
51k (x1.42)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
857 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1008 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
384 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
143 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
2392 points/W
10200 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
3366 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3263 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1317 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1078 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
9024 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4