Core i3-4030U vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.3 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
810f81
Core
Haswell
Picasso
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2014
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4030U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
11.13k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
6.16k
19.38k (x3.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
4.47k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
3.87k (x1.74)
TOTAL
21.57k
38.85k (x1.8)
Multithread
i3-4030U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.84k
17.13k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
15.86k
30.56k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
9.44k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
4.09k (x1.67)
TOTAL
46.09k
61.23k (x1.33)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1456 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1057 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
396 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
163 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
3073 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5627 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3241 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
11353 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4