| | | | | | |

Core i3-4030U vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 36.7 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
100fa0
Core
Haswell
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2014
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4030U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.14k
1.98k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
4.57k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.57k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.01k
3.51k (x1.74)
TOTAL
11.93k
12.64k (x1.06)

Multithread

i3-4030U

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.94k
11.86k (x3.01)
Test#2 (FP)
13.68k
27.4k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.78k
15.39k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.44k
3.46k (x1.42)
TOTAL
25.84k
58.11k (x2.25)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-4030U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.7k
5.17k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
5.99k
5.33k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.65k
2.76k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
3.51k (x1.65)
TOTAL
17.47k
16.77k (x0.96)

Multithread

i3-4030U

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
29.82k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
13.83k
30.79k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.12k
15.88k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
3.69k (x1.49)
TOTAL
36.74k
80.19k (x2.18)

Performance/W
i3-4030U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
953 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
922 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
408 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
166 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
2449 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3525 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3150 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1395 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
9193 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4