Core i3-4030U vs A8 9600
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the 9600 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the 9600 gets 92.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 9600 is 2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 46.1 k points while the 9600 gets 92.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 9600 is 2 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
660f51
Core
Haswell
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2014
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
32.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
92.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-4030U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
10.69k
11.66k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
6.16k
14.96k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
3.33k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
2.8k (x1.26)
TOTAL
21.57k
32.75k (x1.52)
Multithread
i3-4030U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
21.84k
38.61k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
15.86k
38.92k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
11.57k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.45k
3.43k (x1.4)
TOTAL
46.09k
92.52k (x2.01)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
1456 points/W
594 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1057 points/W
599 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
396 points/W
178 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
163 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
3073 points/W
1423 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
9600
Test#1 (Integers)
5627 points/GHz
3429 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3241 points/GHz
4400 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
979 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1173 points/GHz
824 points/GHz
TOTAL
11353 points/GHz
9632 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4