| | | | | | |

Core i3-4030U vs A6 7310


Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the 7310 is based on Puma.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 35.9 k points while the 7310 gets 35.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 7310 is 1 times faster than the i3-4030U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
40651
730f01
Core
Haswell
Carrizo-L
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
FP4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
April 2014
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
11.17k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
35.87k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4030U
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
6.4k
4.08k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
3.76k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
2.21k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
1.12k (x0.55)
TOTAL
17.15k
11.17k (x0.65)

Multithread

i3-4030U

7310
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
13.38k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
15.12k
13.51k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
7.39k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.15k
1.59k (x0.74)
TOTAL
35.88k
35.87k (x1)

Performance/W
i3-4030U
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
857 points/W
535 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1008 points/W
540 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
384 points/W
296 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
143 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
2392 points/W
1435 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
7310
Test#1 (Integers)
3366 points/GHz
1700 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3263 points/GHz
1566 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1317 points/GHz
921 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1078 points/GHz
467 points/GHz
TOTAL
9024 points/GHz
4654 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4