Core i3-4030U vs A4 5000
Description
The i3-4030U is based on Haswell architecture while the 5000 is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 35.9 k points while the 5000 gets 24.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 1.5 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4030U gets a score of 35.9 k points while the 5000 gets 24.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-4030U is 1.5 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
40651
700f01
Core
Haswell
Kabini
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1168
Socket FT3
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
April 2014
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
21.57k points
7.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.09k points
24.71k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-4030U
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
6.4k
2.58k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
6.2k
2.43k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.5k
1.39k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
0.98k (x0.48)
TOTAL
17.15k
7.38k (x0.43)
Multithread
i3-4030U
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
12.86k
9.55k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
15.12k
8.66k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.76k
5.06k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.15k
1.45k (x0.67)
TOTAL
35.88k
24.71k (x0.69)
Performance/W
i3-4030U
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
857 points/W
637 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1008 points/W
577 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
384 points/W
337 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
143 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
2392 points/W
1647 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4030U
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
3366 points/GHz
1721 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3263 points/GHz
1620 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1317 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1078 points/GHz
650 points/GHz
TOTAL
9024 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4