Core i3-3240 vs i3-3217U
Description
Both models i3-3240 and i3-3217U are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3240 gets a score of 49.7 k points while the i3-3217U gets 35.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3240 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-3217U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3240 gets a score of 49.7 k points while the i3-3217U gets 35.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3240 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-3217U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/4
2 /2
TDP
55 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2012
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
24.48k points
16.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.7k points
35.81k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3240
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.46k
5.83k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
10.69k
5.79k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
2.22k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.23k
2.26k (x1.01)
TOTAL
24.48k
16.09k (x0.66)
Multithread
i3-3240
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
17.92k
12.53k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
21.21k
14.19k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.77k
5.63k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
3.46k (x1.24)
TOTAL
49.7k
35.81k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i3-3240
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
326 points/W
737 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
386 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
141 points/W
331 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
204 points/W
TOTAL
904 points/W
2107 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3240
i3-3217U
Test#1 (Integers)
2490 points/GHz
3238 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3145 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
910 points/GHz
1232 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
655 points/GHz
1255 points/GHz
TOTAL
7200 points/GHz
8942 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4