| | | | | | |

Core i3-3220 vs m7-6Y75


Description
The i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the m7-6Y75 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the m7-6Y75 gets 53.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-3220 is 1 times faster than the m7-6Y75. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-Y
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
55 W
4,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2012
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
33.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
53.58k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
10.24k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
15.33k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
2.97k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
5.32k (x1.42)
TOTAL
25.06k
33.86k (x1.35)

Multithread

i3-3220

m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
16.78k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
25.09k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
6.14k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
5.58k (x1.77)
TOTAL
55.82k
53.58k (x0.96)

Performance/W
i3-3220
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
4195 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
6272 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
1534 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
1394 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
13395 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3220
m7-6Y75
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
3304 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
4945 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1715 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
10922 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4