Core i3-3220 vs i7-5820K
Description
The i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i7-5820K gets 129.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 2.3 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i7-5820K gets 129.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 2.3 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306f2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
55 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
15360 kB
Date
September 2012
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
129.06k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
12.03k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
11.23k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
4.55k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.72k (x0.99)
TOTAL
25.06k
31.53k (x1.26)
Multithread
i3-3220
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
49.48k (x2.57)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
52.21k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
19.7k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
7.67k (x2.43)
TOTAL
55.82k
129.06k (x2.31)
Performance/W
i3-3220
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
353 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
373 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
922 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3220
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
3119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
8759 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4