Core i3-3220 vs i7-2640M
Description
The i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-2640M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i7-2640M gets 54.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3220 is 1 times faster than the i7-2640M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i7-2640M gets 54.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3220 is 1 times faster than the i7-2640M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
PGA 988B
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
55 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2012
September 2011
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
25.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
54.86k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
i7-2640M
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
9.63k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
8.33k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
4.08k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.82k (x1.02)
TOTAL
25.06k
25.86k (x1.03)
Multithread
i3-3220
i7-2640M
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
21.22k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
19.6k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
10.09k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
3.94k (x1.25)
TOTAL
55.82k
54.86k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i3-3220
i7-2640M
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
606 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
288 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
1567 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3220
i7-2640M
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1165 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1092 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
7390 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4