| | | | | | |

Core i3-3220 vs i5-7200U


Description
The i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i5-7200U gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1.4 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
55 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2012
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
97.52k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
11.36k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
17.26k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
4.03k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
4.77k (x1.27)
TOTAL
25.06k
37.42k (x1.49)

Multithread

i3-3220

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
24.08k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
41.23k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
10.19k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
4.72k (x1.5)
TOTAL
55.82k
80.22k (x1.44)

Performance/W
i3-3220
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
1605 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
2749 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
679 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
315 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
5348 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3220
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
3666 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1537 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
12072 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4