Core i3-3220 vs i5-2500K
Description
The i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-2500K is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500K is 2 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i5-2500K gets 111.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-2500K is 2 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
55 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2012
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
32.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
111.83k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
11.84k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
10.43k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
5.22k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
5.36k (x1.43)
TOTAL
25.06k
32.85k (x1.31)
Multithread
i3-3220
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
45.51k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
40.83k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
20.7k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
4.79k (x1.52)
TOTAL
55.82k
111.83k (x2)
Performance/W
i3-3220
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
479 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
430 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
218 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
1177 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3220
i5-2500K
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
3200 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
2818 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1449 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
8878 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4