| | | | | | |

Core i3-3220 vs i5-2320


Description
The i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-2320 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i5-2320 gets 66.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2320 is 1.2 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
55 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2012
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
66.48k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
8.88k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
7.84k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
3.79k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.51k (x0.94)
TOTAL
25.06k
24.01k (x0.96)

Multithread

i3-3220

i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
27.98k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
24.48k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
11.42k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
2.6k (x0.83)
TOTAL
55.82k
66.48k (x1.19)

Performance/W
i3-3220
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
295 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
258 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
700 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3220
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
2689 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
2375 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1063 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
7277 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4