Core i3-3220 vs i3-7130U
Description
The i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-7130U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i3-7130U gets 68.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3220 gets a score of 55.8 k points while the i3-7130U gets 68.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7130U is 1.2 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
806e9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
55 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2012
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
25.06k points
42k points
Mean multithread perf.
55.82k points
90.89k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3220
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.29k
9.99k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
9.1k
15.18k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
3.67k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
4.09k (x1.09)
TOTAL
25.06k
32.94k (x1.31)
Multithread
i3-3220
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.26k
20.69k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
24.65k
34.96k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
8.75k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
3.73k (x1.18)
TOTAL
55.82k
68.13k (x1.22)
Performance/W
i3-3220
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
350 points/W
1379 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
448 points/W
2331 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
159 points/W
584 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
1015 points/W
4542 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3220
i3-7130U
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/GHz
3701 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2756 points/GHz
5623 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1359 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1134 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
TOTAL
7593 points/GHz
12200 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4