| | | | | | |

Core i3-3217U vs i5-2300


Description
The i3-3217U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-2300 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3217U gets a score of 35.8 k points while the i5-2300 gets 79.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2300 is 2.2 times faster than the i3-3217U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
206a7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
17 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2012
May 2011
Mean monothread perf.
16.09k points
24.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.81k points
79.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-3217U
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.79k
2.52k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
5.02k
7.01k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.21k
3.77k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.31k
4.22k (x1.83)
TOTAL
11.32k
17.53k (x1.55)

Multithread

i3-3217U

i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
9.46k (x2.65)
Test#2 (FP)
11.47k
26.25k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
14.1k (x2.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
3.13k (x1.23)
TOTAL
22.91k
52.93k (x2.31)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3217U
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
5.83k
8.65k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
5.79k
7.8k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.22k
3.92k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.26k
4.16k (x1.84)
TOTAL
16.09k
24.53k (x1.52)

Multithread

i3-3217U

i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
12.53k
32.45k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
29.25k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.63k
14.64k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
3.12k (x0.9)
TOTAL
35.81k
79.46k (x2.22)

Performance/W
i3-3217U
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
737 points/W
342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
308 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
331 points/W
154 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
204 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
2107 points/W
836 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3217U
i5-2300
Test#1 (Integers)
3238 points/GHz
2791 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3217 points/GHz
2516 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1232 points/GHz
1263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
1343 points/GHz
TOTAL
8942 points/GHz
7912 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4