Core i3-3217U vs i5-10400T
Description
The i3-3217U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3217U gets a score of 35.8 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 6.6 times faster than the i3-3217U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3217U gets a score of 35.8 k points while the i5-10400T gets 235.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 6.6 times faster than the i3-3217U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
a0653
Core
Ivy Bridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2 /2
6/12
TDP
17 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2012
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
16.09k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.81k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-3217U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.79k
4k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
5.02k
14.19k (x2.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.21k
4.62k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.31k
11.03k (x4.77)
TOTAL
11.32k
33.84k (x2.99)
Multithread
i3-3217U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
22.77k (x6.39)
Test#2 (FP)
11.47k
96.59k (x8.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
31.65k (x5.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
2.45k (x0.97)
TOTAL
22.91k
153.46k (x6.7)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3217U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.37k
12.61k (x2.35)
Test#2 (FP)
5.25k
17.94k (x3.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.2k
4.83k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
10.81k (x4.81)
TOTAL
15.08k
46.19k (x3.06)
Multithread
i3-3217U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.46k
74.62k (x5.99)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
119.63k (x9.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
32.65k (x5.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.64k
2.52k (x0.96)
TOTAL
32.75k
229.42k (x7.01)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3217U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.83k
12.5k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
5.79k
19.05k (x3.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.22k
4.72k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.26k
10.3k (x4.56)
TOTAL
16.09k
46.57k (x2.89)
Multithread
i3-3217U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.53k
74.58k (x5.95)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
126.96k (x8.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.63k
31.76k (x5.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
2.5k (x0.72)
TOTAL
35.81k
235.8k (x6.58)
Performance/W
i3-3217U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
737 points/W
2131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
3627 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
331 points/W
907 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
204 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
2107 points/W
6737 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3217U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3238 points/GHz
3472 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3217 points/GHz
5292 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1232 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
2860 points/GHz
TOTAL
8942 points/GHz
12936 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4