Core i3-3217U vs A4 5000
Description
The i3-3217U is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 5000 is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3217U gets a score of 35.8 k points while the 5000 gets 24.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3217U is 1.4 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3217U gets a score of 35.8 k points while the 5000 gets 24.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3217U is 1.4 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
700f01
Core
Ivy Bridge
Kabini
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
Socket FT3
Cores/Threads
2 /2
4/4
TDP
17 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
June 2012
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
16.09k points
7.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
35.81k points
24.71k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3217U
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
5.83k
2.58k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
5.79k
2.43k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.22k
1.39k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.26k
0.98k (x0.43)
TOTAL
16.09k
7.38k (x0.46)
Multithread
i3-3217U
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
12.53k
9.55k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
14.19k
8.66k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.63k
5.06k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.46k
1.45k (x0.42)
TOTAL
35.81k
24.71k (x0.69)
Performance/W
i3-3217U
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
737 points/W
637 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
835 points/W
577 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
331 points/W
337 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
204 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
2107 points/W
1647 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3217U
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
3238 points/GHz
1721 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3217 points/GHz
1620 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1232 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1255 points/GHz
650 points/GHz
TOTAL
8942 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4