| | | | | | |

Core i3-3120M vs i5-3317U


Description
Both models i3-3120M and i5-3317U are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.

"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3120M gets a score of 47.8 k points while the i5-3317U gets 41.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-3120M is 1.2 times faster than the i5-3317U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2 /2
TDP
35 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2012
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
22.12k points
17.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.78k points
41.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3120M
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.92k
6.11k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
7.96k
6.58k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
2.48k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
2.71k (x0.86)
TOTAL
22.12k
17.88k (x0.81)

Multithread

i3-3120M

i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.82k
13.67k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
19k
16.8k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.7k
6.66k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.17k (x0.98)
TOTAL
47.78k
41.31k (x0.86)

Performance/W
i3-3120M
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
481 points/W
804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
543 points/W
988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
220 points/W
392 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
246 points/W
TOTAL
1365 points/W
2430 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3120M
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
3169 points/GHz
2351 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3182 points/GHz
2532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1236 points/GHz
953 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1259 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
8847 points/GHz
6879 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4