| | | | | | |

Core i3-3120M vs i3-1005G1


Description
The i3-3120M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3120M gets a score of 47.8 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 98.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-1005G1 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-3120M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
706e5
Core
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1023
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2 /2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2012
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
22.12k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
47.78k points
116.63k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3120M
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
7.92k
11.93k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
7.96k
16.99k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.09k
6.43k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
4.59k (x1.46)
TOTAL
22.12k
39.93k (x1.81)

Multithread

i3-3120M

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.82k
29.07k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
19k
46.14k (x2.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.7k
19.47k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.18k (x0.98)
TOTAL
47.78k
98.86k (x2.07)

Performance/W
i3-3120M
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
481 points/W
1938 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
543 points/W
3076 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
220 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
279 points/W
TOTAL
1365 points/W
6591 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3120M
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3169 points/GHz
3510 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3182 points/GHz
4996 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1236 points/GHz
1890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1259 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
8847 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4