Core i3-3110M vs Pentium E5200 (M0)
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5200 (M0) is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.7 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.7 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
10676
Core
Ivy Bridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2012
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
2.88k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
6.31k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
2.53k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.35k (x0.52)
TOTAL
18.83k
13.08k (x0.69)
Multithread
i3-3110M
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
5.45k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
11.5k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
4.02k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
1.05k (x0.47)
TOTAL
37.78k
22.02k (x0.58)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
473 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
1080 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2776 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2868 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
7847 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4