Core i3-3110M vs Xeon E5645
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5645 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 2 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the E5645 gets 77 k points.
Summarizing, the E5645 is 2 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206c2
Core
Ivy Bridge
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
6 /6
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2012
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
15.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
76.96k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
6.47k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
4.4k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
2.43k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.33k (x0.9)
TOTAL
18.83k
15.64k (x0.83)
Multithread
i3-3110M
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
34.43k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
24.23k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
14.48k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
3.81k (x1.69)
TOTAL
37.78k
76.96k (x2.04)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
473 points/W
430 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
303 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
181 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
1080 points/W
962 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
E5645
Test#1 (Integers)
2776 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2868 points/GHz
1573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/GHz
867 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
833 points/GHz
TOTAL
7847 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4