| | | | | | |

Core i3-3110M vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.4 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
406f1
Core
Ivy Bridge
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
20480 kB
Date
June 2012
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
237.83k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
8.22k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
12.06k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
4.01k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.89k (x1.11)
TOTAL
18.83k
27.18k (x1.44)

Multithread

i3-3110M

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
61.34k (x3.7)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
90.21k (x7.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
26.2k (x3.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
4.62k (x2.05)
TOTAL
37.78k
182.37k (x4.83)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
6.04k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
10.18k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
2.74k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
2.41k (x1.15)
TOTAL
17.03k
21.37k (x1.25)

Multithread

i3-3110M

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
47.51k (x3.79)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
75.12k (x5.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
19.72k (x3.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
5.45k (x2.25)
TOTAL
33.81k
147.8k (x4.37)

Performance/W
i3-3110M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
559 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
884 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
1739 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
3393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
915 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
7123 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4