Core i3-3110M vs Xeon E5-2620
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 6.6 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 6.6 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
206d7
Core
Ivy Bridge
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
15360 kB
Date
June 2012
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
224.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
6.95k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
6.24k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
3.05k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
2.56k (x1.23)
TOTAL
17.03k
18.8k (x1.1)
Multithread
i3-3110M
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
90.01k (x7.19)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
82.43k (x6.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
42.59k (x8.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
9.66k (x3.98)
TOTAL
33.81k
224.7k (x6.65)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
2365 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4