| | | | | | |

Core i3-3110M vs Pentium N3530


Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the N3530 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the N3530 gets 34.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.1 times faster than the N3530. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
30678
Core
Ivy Bridge
Bay Trail-M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
June 2012
February 2014
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
10.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
34.57k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
4.86k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
2.5k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
1.82k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.26k (x0.48)
TOTAL
18.83k
10.44k (x0.55)

Multithread

i3-3110M

N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
17.22k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
8.89k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
6.89k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
1.57k (x0.7)
TOTAL
37.78k
34.57k (x0.91)

Performance/W
i3-3110M
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
473 points/W
2460 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
984 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
1080 points/W
4938 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
2776 points/GHz
1884 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2868 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/GHz
707 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
488 points/GHz
TOTAL
7847 points/GHz
4047 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4