Core i3-3110M vs Core 2 Duo E7200
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the E7200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.5 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.5 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
10676
Core
Ivy Bridge
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.533 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
3072 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2012
April 2008
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
13.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
25.21k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
2.93k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
6.48k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
2.6k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
1.45k (x0.56)
TOTAL
18.83k
13.46k (x0.71)
Multithread
i3-3110M
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
5.85k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
12.91k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
5.22k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
1.23k (x0.55)
TOTAL
37.78k
25.21k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
473 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
199 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
1080 points/W
388 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
2776 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2868 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
574 points/GHz
TOTAL
7847 points/GHz
5315 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4