| | | | | | |

Core i3-3110M vs i3-6100T


Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the i3-6100T gets 79.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 2.3 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
506e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
105.21k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
10.46k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
17.55k (x2.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
3.71k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
3.07k (x1.47)
TOTAL
17.03k
34.79k (x2.04)

Multithread

i3-3110M

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
23.92k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
42.11k (x3.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
10.51k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.57k (x1.06)
TOTAL
33.81k
79.1k (x2.34)

Performance/W
i3-3110M
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
683 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
300 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
2260 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
3268 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
5485 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
958 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
10872 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4