Core i3-3110M vs i3-6006U
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the i3-6006U gets 49.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.5 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 33.8 k points while the i3-6006U gets 49.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.5 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2012
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
31.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
68.38k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
7.28k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
10.51k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
2.81k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.88k (x1.11)
TOTAL
18.83k
23.48k (x1.25)
Multithread
i3-3110M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
14.98k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
23.68k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
6.37k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
2.43k (x1.08)
TOTAL
37.78k
47.46k (x1.26)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-3110M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.03k
7.34k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
6.6k
11.37k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.31k
2.74k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.08k
3.08k (x1.48)
TOTAL
17.03k
24.53k (x1.44)
Multithread
i3-3110M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.52k
15.32k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
25.61k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
6.36k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.43k
2.58k (x1.06)
TOTAL
33.81k
49.87k (x1.47)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
358 points/W
1022 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
392 points/W
1707 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
147 points/W
424 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
172 points/W
TOTAL
966 points/W
3325 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2515 points/GHz
3670 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2748 points/GHz
5683 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
964 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
868 points/GHz
1540 points/GHz
TOTAL
7095 points/GHz
12265 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4