| | | | | | |

Core i3-3110M vs Celeron G3900TE


Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the G3900TE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the G3900TE gets 49.3 k points.

Summarizing, the G3900TE is 1.3 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
506e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2012
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
27.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
49.34k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
8.56k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
12.25k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
3.17k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
3.35k (x1.29)
TOTAL
18.83k
27.33k (x1.45)

Multithread

i3-3110M

G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
16.42k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
23.61k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
5.75k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
3.55k (x1.58)
TOTAL
37.78k
49.34k (x1.31)

Performance/W
i3-3110M
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
473 points/W
469 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
675 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
164 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
1080 points/W
1410 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
G3900TE
Test#1 (Integers)
2776 points/GHz
3724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2868 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
1455 points/GHz
TOTAL
7847 points/GHz
11885 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4