Core i3-3110M vs Celeron G1610T
Description
Both models i3-3110M and G1610T are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1 times faster than the i3-3110M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
306a9
Core
Ivy Bridge
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
June 2012
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
38.59k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
7.87k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
7.14k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
3.04k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.79k (x1.07)
TOTAL
18.83k
20.84k (x1.11)
Multithread
i3-3110M
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
15.12k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
14.05k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
5.94k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
3.48k (x1.55)
TOTAL
37.78k
38.59k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
473 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
1080 points/W
1103 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2776 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2868 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
7847 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4