Core i3-3110M vs Celeron 3855U
Description
The i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 3855U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the 3855U gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.5 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-3110M gets a score of 37.8 k points while the 3855U gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.5 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2096 kB
Date
June 2012
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
17.03k points
19.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.81k points
24.56k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-3110M
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.66k
5.93k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
6.88k
8.53k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.68k
2.28k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.6k
2.5k (x0.96)
TOTAL
18.83k
19.24k (x1.02)
Multithread
i3-3110M
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.56k
7.87k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
11.7k
11.28k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.28k
2.91k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.25k
2.5k (x1.11)
TOTAL
37.78k
24.56k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i3-3110M
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
473 points/W
524 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
334 points/W
752 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
208 points/W
194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
64 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
1080 points/W
1637 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-3110M
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
2776 points/GHz
3706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2868 points/GHz
5333 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/GHz
1423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1084 points/GHz
1562 points/GHz
TOTAL
7847 points/GHz
12024 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4